Convex Model for Controlled Islanding in Transmission Expansion Planning to Improve Frequency Stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intentional controlled islanding (ICI) is the last resort to split an endangered power system into smaller islands to prevent blackout. New lines that are planned by transmission expansion planning (TEP) can affect the stability of islands during ICI. In this paper, an ICI-TEP method is proposed to improve the stability of islands by more efficient planning of transmission assets. Moreover, by developing a criterion for the frequency of center of inertia (COI) in each island, the frequency deviations of generators from the COI frequency are minimized to result in more stable islands. The proposed ICI-TEP, incorporating AC network representation, is modeled as mixed-integer linear programming and quadratic convex problems ensuring tractability. A Benders decomposition strategy is also proposed to solve the problem. Results of testing the proposed ICI-TEP method on IEEE 39-bus and 300-bus test systems confirm its effectiveness, compared to conventional TEP, in terms of coping with sever disturbances by creating more stable islands with a lower load shedding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".