MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042920671 · doi:10.1214/22-aap1784

Fast and memory-optimal dimension reduction using Kac’s walk

2022· article· en· W3042920671 on OpenAlexaff
Vishesh Jain, Natesh S. Pillai, Ashwin Sah, Mehtaab Sawhney, Aaron Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Applied Probability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConjectureDimension (graph theory)Random walkReduction (mathematics)Isometry (Riemannian geometry)CombinatoricsMoment (physics)Connection (principal bundle)Restricted isometry propertyDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmPure mathematicsStatisticsCompressed sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we analyze dimension reduction algorithms based on the Kac walk and discrete variants. (1) For n points in Rd, we design an optimal Johnson–Lindenstrauss (JL) transform based on the Kac walk which can be applied to any vector in time O(dlogd) for essentially the same restriction on n as in the best-known transforms due to Ailon and Liberty, and Bamberger and Krahmer. Our algorithm is memory-optimal, and outperforms existing algorithms in regimes when n is sufficiently large and the distortion parameter is sufficiently small. In particular, this confirms a conjecture of Ailon and Chazelle, and of Oliveira, in a stronger form. (2) The same construction gives a simple transform with optimal restricted isometry property (RIP) which can be applied in time O(dlogd) for essentially the same range of sparsity as in the best-known such transform due to Ailon and Rauhut. (3) We show that by fixing the angle in the Kac walk to be π/4 throughout, one obtains optimal JL and RIP transforms with almost the same running time, thereby confirming—up to a loglogd factor—a conjecture of Avron, Maymounkov, and Toledo. Our moment-based analysis of this modification of the Kac walk may also be of independent interest in connection with repeated averaging processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Annals of Applied ProbabilitySame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207