MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042983652

Impact of Non-motor Symptoms on the Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease Patients

2020· article· en· W3042983652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S Rakhmatova, Nodira Akhmatova, Sadriddin Pulatov, G Akhmatova

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Montreal Cognitive AssessmentParkinson's diseaseDiseaseRating scaleMotor symptomsCognitionPhysical therapyMovement disordersInternal medicineCognitive impairmentPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects about 1–2% of the population over 65 years of age and up to 3–5% of people 85 years of age and older. PD is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by a combination of motor and non-motor symptoms. NMS contribute to overall healthcare costs and have a profound impact on the quality of life of both patients and caregivers. Their improved management has been identified as a major unmet medical need. The main clinical symptoms of PD are well understood, but it is necessary to continue studying the changes of symptoms as it progresses. The nonmotor symptoms (NMS) of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are important factors for quality of life (QOL). Few studies on NMS have been conducted in Asian PD patients. The aims of the research. To study the structure of non-motor symptoms (NMS) at the early and last stages of PD, to determine the frequency and clinical significance of the NMS at different stages of PD, comparing the severity of NMS in PD with the severity of the same symptoms in the natural aging, to study the quality of life (QOL) of patients with the impact assessment of the NMS and the assessment of motor symptoms on this features. The material and methods. The study included 40 patients with PD and 15 patients without neurodegenerative disorders (control group). The degree of movement disorders severity was assessed using UPDRS scale. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Rating Scale (MoCA). To identify and assess the severity of NMS questionnaire used NMSS. Assessment of quality of life of patients was carried out by PDQ-26 questionnaire. Results. There was a significant difference between the intensity of the NMS in PD patients and the control group. Intensity of NMS significantly correlated with disease stage, disease duration, with the points on the UPDRS scale. NMS had at least some impact on quality of life for 84% of the respondents; 48% indicated that NMS represented a greater challenge than motor symptoms. Conclusion. NMS significantly affect the quality of life, their severity and structure varies considerably from early to late stage PD, and they are the result of a neurodegenerative process, and not the natural aging process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medicine and Medical SciencesSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207