MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042987160 · doi:10.1111/jnc.15126

Wild‐type and mutant SOD1 localizes to RNA‐rich structures in cells and mice but does not bind RNA

2020· article· en· W3042987160 on OpenAlexafffund
Matteo Da Ros, Harmeen K. Deol, Alexandre Savard, Hui‐Shan Guo, Elizabeth M. Meiering, Derrick Gibbings

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooSKiN HealthUniversity of Ottawa
FundersInstitute of GeneticsScience and Engineering Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaALS Society of CanadaHealth Research
KeywordsSOD1RNARNA-binding proteinRNA splicingStress granuleMolecular biologyMessenger RNABiologyCell biologyMutantGeneChemistryGeneticsTranslation (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many of the genes whose mutation causes Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) are RNA-binding proteins which localize to stress granules, while others impact the assembly, stability, and elimination of stress granules. This has led to the hypothesis that alterations in the dynamics of stress granules and RNA biology cause ALS. Genetic mutations in Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1) also cause ALS. Evidence demonstrates that SOD1 harboring ALS-linked mutations is recruited to stress granules, induces changes in alternative splicing, and could be an RNA-binding protein. Whether SOD1 inclusions contain RNA in disease models and whether SOD1 directly binds RNA remains uncertain. We applied methods including cross-linking immunoprecipitation and in vitro gel shift assays to detect binding of SOD1 to RNA in vitro, in cells with and without stress granules, and in mice expressing human SOD1 G93A. We find that SOD1 localizes to RNA-rich structures including stress granules, and SOD1 inclusions in mice contain mRNA. However, we find no evidence that SOD1 directly binds RNA. This suggests that SOD1 may impact stress granules, alternative splicing and RNA biology without binding directly to RNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207