MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043121355 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2020.3010178

Novel Series <i>LC</i> Resonance-Pulse-Based ZCS Current-Fed Full-Bridge DC–DC Converter: Analysis, Design, and Experimental Results

2020· article· en· W3043121355 on OpenAlexafffund
Swati Tandon, Akshay Kumar Rathore

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvertersPulse-width modulationCommutationVoltageSemiconductor deviceCurrent (fluid)Resonance (particle physics)Pulse (music)Electronic engineeringCapacitorRLC circuitDuty cycleClampingElectrical engineeringSeries and parallel circuitsComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A current-fed full-bridge converter availing series resonance pulse to enable zero-current switching (ZCS) and voltage clamping of the semiconductor devices is proposed. Overlap in switching states of the devices enforces a short resonance pulse, due to series tank which naturally reduces the current to zero in the outgoing semiconductor devices. It causes zero-current commutation of the devices eliminating voltage spike across the semiconductor devices. Essentially, pulse-resonance offers reduced circulating current resulting in lower conduction losses and not demanding over-rated components. The proposed converter enables ZCS for wide variation in source voltage by implementing variable frequency fixed duty modulation eliminating the traditional requirement for additional clamping circuitry in conventional current-fed converters. Detailed experimental results on proof-of-concept hardware prototype rated at 500 W are demonstrated to verify the proposed claims and converter performance. With all other merits, proposed converter maintains high efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207