MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043135207 · doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1262-y

Integrating agroecological production in a robust post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

2020· article· en· W3043135207 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Cherico Wanger, Fabrice DeClerck, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Jaboury Ghazoul, David Kleijn, Alexandra‐Maria Klein, Claire Kremen, Harold A. Mooney, Ivette Perfecto, Luke L. Powell, Josef Settele, Mirco Solé, Teja Tscharntke, Wolfgang W. Weisser

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Ecology & Evolution · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesConsortium of International Agricultural Research CentersGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of the PhilippinesAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichDeutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-LeipzigConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasWageningen University and ResearchUniversidad Nacional de Río NegroHelmholtz-Zentrum für UmweltforschungUniversiteit UtrechtDurham UniversityUniversidade Estadual de Santa CruzWestlake University
KeywordsAgroecologySustainabilityProduction (economics)BiodiversityChinaAgroforestryAgricultureEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringGeographyEngineeringEcologyEconomicsBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Ecology & EvolutionSame topicCocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyFrench-language works237,207