MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043150753 · doi:10.15252/emmm.201911908

Characterization of circulating breast cancer cells with tumorigenic and metastatic capacity

2020· article· en· W3043150753 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Koch, Andra Kuske, Simon A. Joosse, Gökhan Yigit, George Sflomos, Sonja Thaler, Daniel J. Smit, Stefan Werner, Kerstin Borgmann, Sebastian Gärtner, Parinaz Mossahebi Mohammadi, Laura Battista, Laure Cayrefourcq, Janine Altmüller, Gabriela Salinas-Riester, Kaamini Raithatha, Arne Zibat, Y. Goy, Leonie Ott, Kai Bartkowiak, Tuan Zea Tan, Qing Zhou, Michael R. Speicher, Volkmar Müller, Tobias M. Gorges, Manfred Jücker, Jean Paul Thiery, Cathrin Brisken, Sabine Riethdorf, Catherine Alix‐Panabières, Klaus Pantel

Bibliographic record

VenueEMBO Molecular Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersInnovative Medicines InitiativeServierDeutsche KrebshilfeEuropean Research CouncilFondation ISRECCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de MontpellierKrebsliga SchweizDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftBiltema Foundation
KeywordsLibrary scienceMedicineGerontologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Functional studies giving insight into the biology of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) remain scarce due to the low frequency of CTCs and lack of appropriate models. Here, we describe the characterization of a novel CTC‐derived breast cancer cell line, designated CTC‐ITB‐01, established from a patient with metastatic estrogen receptor‐positive (ER + ) breast cancer, resistant to endocrine therapy. CTC‐ITB‐01 remained ER + in culture, and copy number alteration (CNA) profiling showed high concordance between CTC‐ITB‐01 and CTCs originally present in the patient with cancer at the time point of blood draw. RNA‐sequencing data indicate that CTC‐ITB‐01 has a predominantly epithelial expression signature. Primary tumor and metastasis formation in an intraductal PDX mouse model mirrored the clinical progression of ER + breast cancer. Downstream ER signaling was constitutively active in CTC‐ITB‐01 independent of ligand availability, and the CDK4/6 inhibitor Palbociclib strongly inhibited CTC‐ITB‐01 growth. Thus, we established a functional model that opens a new avenue to study CTC biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations117
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEMBO Molecular MedicineSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207