MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Lagrangian strategy for in situ sampling the physical-biological coupling at fine scale : the PROTEVSMED-SWOT 2018 cruise

2020· preprint· en· W3043175117 on OpenAlexaff
Roxane Tzortzis, Andrea M. Doglioli, Stéphanie Barrillon, Anne Petrenko, Francesco d’Ovidio, Lloyd Izard, Mélilotus Thyssen, Ananda Pascual, Frédéric Cyr, Franck Dumas, Gérald Grégori

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAdenylate kinaseInternal medicineBiologyEndocrinologyBiochemistryEnzymeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term "fine scales" is generally used to refer to the ocean processes occuring on horizontal scales smaller than 10 km and characterized by a short lifetime (days/weeks). Fine scales have been predominantly studied with numerical simulations and satellite observations which have highlighted their significant role on biological processes. Indeed, their short time scale is the same as a lot of important processes in phytoplankton dynamics. Model simulations have shown that fine scales such as fronts and filaments strongly influence the distribution of phytoplankton species. Nowadays, the combination of in situ measurements, satellite observations and model simulations is a necessity to better understand these mechanisms. However these processes are particularly challenging to sample in situ because of their size and their ephemeral nature. The PROTEVSMED-SWOT cruise was performed in the Western Mediterranean Sea, in the southern region of the Balearic Islands, onboard BHO Beautemps-Beaupré, between April 30 th and May 14 th , 2018. In order to study the influence of fine scales on the distribution of phytoplankton species, a satellite-based adaptive Lagrangian sampling strategy has been deployed in order to i) identify a fine scale structure of interest, ii) sample it at high spatial resolution the phytoplankton community, and iii) follow the evolution of this structure and the related distribution of phytoplankton. The SPASSO software package uses satellite altimetry, SST and surface Chl a concentration data to generate and provide near-real time daily maps of the dynamical and biogeochemical structures present in the area. The sampling strategy was defined in order to cross a frontal zone separating different types of water. Multidisciplinary in situ sensors (hull-mounted ADCP, a Seasoar towed fish and an automated flow cytometer installed on the seawater supply of the Thermosalinograph) were used to sample at high spatial resolution physical and biological variables. A particular attention was put in adapting the temporal sampling in different water masses to the biological time scales in order to reconstruct the phytoplankton diurnal cycle. Such a strategy was successful in sampling two different water masses separated by a narrow front and characterized by different aboundances of several phytoplankton species and functional groups. Consequently, our results highlight the role of the front on the physical and biological coupling confirming previous modelling and remote-sensing studies. The new generation of altimetric satellite, SWOT, will provide a 2D sea surface height at an unprecedented resolution and it will be a unique opportunity to better observe fine scale structures in the global ocean. Our methodology paves the way to future in situ experiments that are planned in 2022 during the SWOT fast-sampling phase, few months after its launch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→