Targeted intragenic demethylation initiates chromatin rewiring for gene activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aberrant DNA methylation in the region surrounding the transcription start site is a hallmark of gene silencing in cancer. Currently approved demethylating agents lack specificity and exhibit high toxicity. Herein we show, using the p16 gene as an example, that targeted demethylation of the promoter-exon 1-intron 1 (PrExI) region initiates an epigenetic wave of local chromatin remodeling and distal long-range interactions, culminating in gene-locus specific activation. Through development of CRISPR-DiR (DNMT1-interacting RNA), in which ad hoc edited guides block methyltransferase activity in a locus-specific fashion, we demonstrate that demethylation is coupled to epigenetic and topological changes. These results suggest the existence of a specialized “demethylation firing center (DFC)” which can be switched on by an adaptable and selective RNA-mediated approach for locus-specific transcriptional activation. One Sentence Summary Locus demethylation via CRISPR-DiR reshapes chromatin structure and specifically reactivates its cognate gene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".