Consequences of a short-term exposure to a sub lethal concentration of CdO nanoparticles on key life history traits in the fruit fly ( <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nanoparticles of cadmium oxide (CdO NPs) are among the most common industrial metal oxide nanoparticles. Early adulthood (F 0 ) fruit flies ( D. melanogaster ) were exposed for 7 days to a sub lethal concentration (0.03 mg CdO NPs/ml, which was 20% of the LC 50 ), spiked into food media to test for long term-effects over time and beyond their direct exposure on key life history traits. Effects on survival, developmental time, eclosion rate, fecundity and negative geotaxis performance were assessed. Potential effects on ultrastructure of mid gut cells were also investigated by use of electron microscopy. All studied life history traits, as well as climbing behavior were adversely affected by exposure to CdO NPs. In non-exposed progeny (F 1 ) of adult flies (F 0 ), a blistered wing phenotype was also observed. Lysis of nuclear and rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) membranes, mitochondrial swelling and lysis were among the most common cellular alterations observed in midgut cells of F 0 flies exposed to CdO NPs. Genes encoding for metallothionein (MTn A-D) were significantly upregulated in both parent flies (F 0 ) and their progeny (F 1 ) after exposure of F 0 flies to CdO NPs, compared to unexposed, control flies, a result which indicated potential, long-term effects. Taken together, these results suggest that short-term exposure to a sublethal concentration of CdO NPs is sufficient to cause long-lasting, harmful effects on fruit flies. Graphical Abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".