Generalised gingival enlargement as a sole manifestation of IgG4-related disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An 18-year-old woman presented with enlarged gingivae of 1-year duration with no history of drug consumption or systemic conditions that might explain the enlargement. Biopsy revealed hyperplastic gingival epithelium and a plasma cell-rich inflammatory infiltrate in the subepithelial connective tissue with the presence of scattered multinucleated giant cells. Immunostaining revealed the plasma cells to be positive for IgG4. Serum IgG4 levels were elevated at 3.6 g/L (reference range: 0.049-1.985). These findings led towards the diagnosis of an IgG4-related disease (RD). Other granulomatous conditions were also ruled out via series of investigations. The enlarged tissue was surgically excised. No corticosteroids were administered owing to the localised nature of the manifestations. After 3 months, the gingival size remained unchanged. This case has been reported with a relatively shorter follow-up period because of the rarity of the presentation. IgG4-RD should be considered while diagnosing a patient with gingival enlargement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".