MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.3

2020· article· lv· W3043554932 on OpenAlexaff
Arjan Plompen, Ó. Cabellos, C. De Saint Jean, Michael Fleming, A. Algora, M. Angelone, P. Archier, E. Bauge, O. Bersillon, A. I. Blokhin, F. Cantargi, A. Chebboubi, C.J. Díez, H. Duarte, E. Dupont, James Dyrda, Bernard Erasmus, Luca Fiorito, U. Fischer, D. Flammini, Daniela Foligno, Mark R. Gilbert, J.R. Granada, Wim Haeck, F.-J. Hambsch, Petter Helgesson, S. Hilaire, I. D. Hill, Mathieu Hursin, R. Ichou, R. Jacqmin, Bohumil Jánský, Cédric Jouanne, M.A. Kellett, D. H. Kim, H. I. Kim, I. Kodeli, A. J. Koning, A.Yu. Konobeyev, S. Kopecky, Bor Kos, A. Krása, L.C. Leal, Nicolas Leclaire, Young-Chan Lee, H. Leeb, O. Litaize, M. Majerle, J. I Márquez Damián, F. Michel-Sendis, R.W. Mills, Benjamin Morillon, G. Noguère, M. Pecchia, S. Pelloni, P. Pereslavtsev, Robert J. Perry, D. Rochman, A. Röhrmoser, P. Romain, Pablo Romojaro, D. Roubtsov, P. Sauvan, P. Schillebeeckx, Konrad Schmidt, O. Sérot, Sergey Simakov, I. Sirakov, Henrik Sjöstrand, Jean-Christophe Sublet, Pierre Tamagno, Andrej Trkov, S.C. van der Marck, F. Álvarez‐Velarde, R. Villari, Thomas Ware, Keiichi Yokoyama, Gašper Žerovnik

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal A · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library 3.3 is described. New evaluations for neutron-induced interactions with the major actinides $$^{235}\hbox {U}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>235</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>U</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> , $$^{238}\hbox {U}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>U</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> and $$^{239}\hbox {Pu}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>239</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Pu</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> , on $$^{241}\hbox {Am}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>241</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Am</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> and $$^{23}\hbox {Na}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Na</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> , $$^{59}\hbox {Ni}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>59</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext>Ni</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> , Cr, Cu, Zr, Cd, Hf, W, Au, Pb and Bi are presented. It includes new fission yields, prompt fission neutron spectra and average number of neutrons per fission. In addition, new data for radioactive decay, thermal neutron scattering, gamma-ray emission, neutron activation, delayed neutrons and displacement damage are presented. JEFF-3.3 was complemented by files from the TENDL project. The libraries for photon, proton, deuteron, triton, helion and alpha-particle induced reactions are from TENDL-2017. The demands for uncertainty quantification in modeling led to many new covariance data for the evaluations. A comparison between results from model calculations using the JEFF-3.3 library and those from benchmark experiments for criticality, delayed neutron yields, shielding and decay heat, reveals that JEFF-3.3 performes very well for a wide range of nuclear technology applications, in particular nuclear energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Dataset
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Dataset
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1230.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations678
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal ASame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207