Comparison of Atrial Remodeling Caused by Sustained Atrial Flutter Versus Atrial Fibrillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with AF-promoting atrial remodeling, but no experimental studies have addressed remodeling with sustained AFL. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to define the atrial remodeling caused by sustained atrial flutter (AFL) and/or atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Intercaval radiofrequency lesions created a substrate for sustained isthmus-dependent AFL, confirmed by endocavity mapping. Four groups (6 dogs per group) were followed for 3 weeks: sustained AFL; sustained AF (600 beats/min atrial tachypacing); AF superimposed on an AFL substrate (AF+AFLs); sinus rhythm (SR) with an AFL substrate (SR+AFLs; control group). All dogs had atrioventricular-node ablation and ventricular pacemakers at 80 beats/min to control ventricular rate. RESULTS: Monitoring confirmed spontaneous AFL maintenance >99% of the time in dogs with AFL. At terminal open-chest study, left-atrial (LA) effective refractory period was reduced similarly with AFL, AF+AFLs and AF, while AF vulnerability to extrastimuli increased in parallel. Induced AF duration increased significantly in AF+AFLs and AF, but not AFL. Dogs with AF+AFLs had shorter cycle lengths and substantial irregularity versus dogs with AFL. LA volume increased in AF+AFLs and AF, but not dogs with AFL, versus SR+AFLs. Optical mapping showed significant conduction slowing in AF+AFLs and AF but not AFL, paralleling atrial fibrosis and collagen-gene upregulation. Left-ventricular function did not change in any group. Transcriptomic analysis revealed substantial dysregulation of inflammatory and extracellular matrix-signaling pathways with AF and AF+ALs but not AFL. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained AFL causes atrial repolarization changes like those in AF but, unlike AF or AF+AFLs, does not induce structural remodeling. These results provide novel insights into AFL-induced remodeling and suggest that early intervention may be important to prevent irreversible fibrosis when AF intervenes in a patient with AFL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".