A pursuit‐evasion game with hybrid system of dynamics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pursuit-evasion games are the next logical stage in the exploring of powerful, intelligent, adaptive performance. In fact the optimal strategy is known for games in an infinitely sized playing field. The quality of the machine learning methods can thus be compared to the optimal performance possible. Therefore, we consider in this study a pursuit-evasion differential game in Hilbert space l 2 with a hybrid system of dynamics. The game consists of a non-inertial pursuer and an inertial evader where controls of the pursuer and the evader are satisfied to the integral constraints. The duration of the game, φ, is fixed. The position of the evader at time φ satisfies to the phase constraint. We obtain attainability domains of the players and then we make a winning strategy for the pursuer which guarantees capturing the evader. We show that our constructed strategy is admissible as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it