MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043872133 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v22i3.a08

Preparation of environmentally friendly and energy-saving autoclaved aerated concrete using gold tailings

2019· article· en· W3043872133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shaanxi ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Hebei ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsTailingsEnvironmentally friendlyAerationAutoclaved aerated concreteEnvironmental scienceWaste managementMetallurgyEngineeringCivil engineeringMaterials scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gold tailings (GTS) are solid wastes from gold mining operations by mining enterprises. At present, China's GTS are basically in a state of tailings storage. According to statistics, from 2014 to 2018, the national GTS emissions reached 920 million tons, which brought serious environmental and safety problems to the mining area. Therefore, it has become a top priority to conduct secondary development and utilization of resources for the GTS Due to its high silicon content, the GTS can be used as the admixtures to prepare autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC). This can effectively absorb a large amount of GTS, which makes it one of the key projects of the 12th Five-Year Plan for comprehensive utilization of bulk industrial solid wastes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it