MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043892996 · doi:10.1002/ehf2.12824

Detection of Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome After Ventricular Assist Device by Total Thrombus-Formation Analysis System

2020· article· en· W3043892996 on OpenAlexaff
Seiji Takashio, Koichi Kaikita, Masato Nishi, Mami Morioka, Taiki Higo, Akira Shiose, Tsuyoshi Doman, Hisanori Horiuchi, Toshihiro Fukui, Kenichi Tsujita

Bibliographic record

VenueESC Heart Failure · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsMedicineThrombusCardiologyVon Willebrand factorInternal medicineVentricular assist deviceHeart failurePlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Bleeding is a serious complication in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS; type 2A) develops because of high shear stress inside the pumps and is a cause of bleeding complication. Although von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimer analysis is useful for diagnosing AVWS, it is only performed in specialized research institutes. A novel microchip flow chamber system, the total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS), is a point-of-care system to evaluate the thrombus-formation process and useful for monitoring platelet thrombus-formation capacity in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy and the diagnosis and evaluation of the clinical severity of von Willebrand disease type 1. However, little is known about the association between AVWS and platelet thrombus-formation capacity evaluated by T-TAS in patients with CF-LVAD. We aimed to evaluate the utility of T-TAS for easy detection of AVWS in patients with CF-LVAD. Methods and results We simultaneously evaluated the vWF large multimers and T-TAS parameters in four consecutive patients with axial-type CF-LVAD and eight control patients treated with aspirin and warfarin. vWF large multimer index was defined as the proportion of large multimers in total vWF derived from a normal control plasma. T-TAS analyses different thrombus-formation processes using two microchips with different thrombogenic surfaces. PL24-AUC10 levels in the platelet (PL) chip are highly sensitive for platelet functions, while AR10-AUC30 levels in the atheroma (AR) chip allow the assessment of the overall haemostatic ability. vWF large multimer index and T-TAS parameters were decreased in all patients with CF-LVAD. The mean PL24-AUC10 level (5.4 ± 2.9 vs. 219 ± 67; P < 0.01), AR10-AUC30 level (338 ± 460 vs. 1604 ± 160; P < 0.01) and vWF large multimer index (49 ± 11% vs. 112 ± 27%; P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the patients with CF-LVAD than in control patients. One patient showed changes in T-TAS levels before and after implantation of CF-LVAD. PL24-AUC10 and AR10-AUC30 levels decreased from 438.1 to 5.0 and from 1667.9 to 1134.3, respectively. Conclusions In patients with CF-LVAD, the platelet thrombus-formation capacity was extremely impaired because of AVWS, and T-TAS parameters could detect the presence of AVWS. T-TAS can be used for easy detection of AVWS as a point-of-care testing. Further studies with a large sample size are needed to validate our results in several LVAD models and evaluate the prognostic value of bleeding complications and thromboembolism in patients with LVAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESC Heart FailureSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207