MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Power Minimization Via Rate Splitting in Downlink Cloud-Radio Access Networks

2020· article· en· W3044021186 on OpenAlexaff
Alaa Alameer Ahmad, Hayssam Dahrouj, Anas Chaaban, Aydin Sezgin, Tareq Y. Al-Naffouri, Mohamed‐Slim Alouini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceTelecommunications linkCloud computingComputer networkTransmitter power outputRadio access networkBase stationInterference (communication)C-RANWirelessProvisioningOptimization problemAccess networkTransmitterDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsAlgorithmMobile station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Minimizing the power consumption in mobile communication networks while guaranteeing quality of service (QoS) requirements is essential in light of the unprecedented increase in the number of connected devices and the associated data traffic. Conventional cloud-radio access networks (C-RAN) assume treating interference as noise (TIN) while dealing with the provisioning of wireless interference. This paper considers a C-RAN system, where a central processor (CP) at the cloud is connected to several base-stations (BSs) via limited capacity fronthaul links. The paper then assumes a communication scheme where the CP applies rate splitting (RS) to the messages requested by the users, and enables common message decoding (CMD) at the receivers side. The paper addresses the problem of minimizing the weighted transmit power subject to minimum QoS and fronthaul capacity constraints, which is generally a non-convex and difficult problem to solve. We, therefore, propose an iterative approach based on inner-convex approximations (ICA) to obtain a stationary point of the optimization problem. The simulations show the power savings achieved by the proposed RS-CMD scheme as compared to the conventional TIN, especially at high QoS requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207