Cost-function testing methodology for image-based registration of endoscopy to CT images in the head and neck
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the largest geometric uncertainties in designing radiotherapy treatment plans for squamous cell cancers of the head and neck is contouring the gross tumor volume. We have previously described a method of projecting mucosal disease contours, visible on endoscopy, to volumetrically reconstructed planning computed tomography (CT) datasets, using electromagnetic (EM) tracking of a flexible endoscope, enabling rigid registration between endoscopic and CT images.However, to achieve better accuracy for radiotherapy planning, we propose refining this initial registration with image-based registration methods. In this paper, several types of cost functions are evaluated based on accuracy and robustness. Three phantoms and eight clinical cases are used to test each cost function, with initial registration of endoscopy to CT provided by the pose of the flexible endoscope recovered from EM tracking. Cost function classes include: cross correlation, mutual information and gradient methods. For each test case, a ground truth virtual camera pose was first defined by manual registration of anatomical features visible in both real and virtual endoscope images. A new set of evenly spaced fiducial points and a sample contour were created and projected onto the CT image to be used in assessing image registration quality. A new set of 5000 displaced poses was generated by random sampling displacements along each translational and rotational dimension. At each pose, fiducial and contour points in the real image were again projected on the CT image. The cost function, fiducial registration error and contouring error values were then calculated.While all cost functions performed well in select cases, only the normalized gradient field function consistently had registration errors less than 2 mm, which is the accuracy needed if this application of registering mucosal disease identified on optical image to CT images is to be used in the clinical practice of radiation treatment planning.(Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02704169).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".