MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044156684 · doi:10.32479/ijefi.9630

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF DAIRY FARMS IN CENTRAL KOSOVO

2020· article· en· W3044156684 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Reuf Shkodra, János Felföldi, Krisztián Kovács, Donika Maloku

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Financial Issues · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEfficiency Analysis Using DEA
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersManitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Development
KeywordsAgricultureData envelopment analysisAgricultural scienceChristian ministryAgricultural economicsBusinessContext (archaeology)PaymentDairy farmingEconomicsGeographyEnvironmental scienceMathematicsFinanceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kosovo has the key resources needed for a developed agriculture. However, Kosovo's agriculture consists of very small farms which are featured with the fragmentation of their land, old buildings and equipment, though functional. Ministry of Agriculture (MAFRD) started to support farmers with direct payments in 2009, but only for a few agricultural cultures. Support for dairy cows started in 2012, and support for milk quality started in 2014. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to accurately portray the characteristics, and technical efficiency of dairy farms in Central Kosovo, respectively in the region of Pristina - beneficiaries of direct payments for milk quality. Consequently, through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), under Variable Return to Scale (VRS) using output orientation, the efficiency rate of dairy farmers is calculated. Therefore, findings show that not all the farms are fully efficient, or fully utilizing their assets and their inputs. Additionally, the study revealed that the size of the farm, and the feeding system affect the TE. Therefore, large-size farms and farms who used seasonal grazing had overall higher TE. However, the level of education does not have a significant effect on the farm's efficiency.Keywords: Dairy sector, Kosovo, Technical Efficiency, Data envelopment analysisJEL Classifications: D24, Q12, Q1DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.9630

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and Financial IssuesSame topicEfficiency Analysis Using DEAFrench-language works237,207