MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Low-Complexity Approach for Sum-Rate Maximization in Cooperative NOMA Enhanced Cellular Networks

2020· article· en· W3044192623 on OpenAlexaff
Phuc Dinh, Mohamed Amine Arfaoui, Sanaa Sharafeddine, Chadi Assi, Ali Ghrayeb

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkComputer scienceMaximizationBase stationQuality of serviceMathematical optimizationHeuristicPower controlNomaComputational complexity theoryOptimization problemComputer networkPower (physics)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the performance of cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access (C-NOMA) in a cellular downlink system. The system model consists of a base station (BS) serving multiple users, where users that have the capability of full-duplex (FD) communications can assist the transmissions between the BS and users with poor channel quality through device-to-device (D2D) communications. To maximize the achievable sum rate of the whole system while guaranteeing a certain quality of service (QoS) for all users, we formulate and solve a novel optimization problem that jointly determines the optimal D2D user pairing and the optimal power control scheme. The formulated problem is a mixed-integer non-linear program (MINLP), which has extremely high complexity. To overcome this issue, a two-step policy is proposed to solve the problem in polynomial time. First, we derive a closed-form expression of the optimal power control scheme that maximizes the sum rate of a given pair of users with a required QoS. Then, using the derived closed-form in the first step, we employ the Hungarian algorithm as the pairing policy in multi-user settings. Our simulation results show that the proposed scheme prevails some previously proposed heuristic approach for the given problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207