MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044206167 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00809

Sinoatrial Node Structure, Mechanics, Electrophysiology and the Chronotropic Response to Stretch in Rabbit and Mouse

2020· article· en· W3044206167 on OpenAlexafffund
Eilidh MacDonald, Josef Madl, Joachim Greiner, Ahmed F. Ramadan, Sarah Wells, Angelo G. Torrente, Peter Köhl, Eva A. Rog‐Zielinska, T. Alexander Quinn

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMitacsHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Molecular Biology LaboratoryBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsChronotropicSinoatrial nodeElectrophysiologyInternal medicineChemistryMedicineNeuroscienceBiophysicsEndocrinologyBiologyCardiologyHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rhythmic electrical activity of the heart’s natural pacemaker, the sinoatrial node (SAN), determines cardiac beating rate (BR). SAN electrical activity is tightly controlled by multiple factors, including tissue stretch, which may contribute to adaptation of BR to changes in venous return. In most animals, including human, there is a robust increase in BR when the SAN is stretched. However, the chronotropic response to sustained stretch differs in mouse SAN, where it causes variable responses, including decreased BR. The reasons for this species difference are unclear. They are thought to relate to dissimilarities in SAN electrophysiology (particularly action potential morphology) between mouse and other species, and to how these interact with sub-cellular stretch-activated mechanisms. Furthermore, species-related differences in structural and mechanical properties of the SAN may influence the chronotropic response to SAN stretch. Here we assess: (i) how the BR response to sustained stretch of rabbit and mouse isolated SAN relates to tissue stiffness; (ii) whether structural differences could account for observed differences in BR responsiveness to stretch; and (iii) whether pharmacological modification of mouse SAN electrophysiology alters stretch-induced chronotropy. We found disparities in the relationship between SAN stiffness and the magnitude of the chronotropic response to stretch between rabbit and mouse, along with differences in SAN collagen structure, alignment, and changes with stretch. We further observed that pharmacological modification to prolong mouse SAN action potential plateau duration rectified the direction of BR changes during sustained stretch, resulting in a positive chronotropic response akin to that of other species. Overall, our results suggest that structural, mechanical, and background electrophysiological properties of the SAN influence the chronotropic response to stretch. Improved insight into the biophysical determinants of stretch effects on SAN pacemaking is essential for a comprehensive understanding of SAN regulation, with important implications for studies of SAN physiology and its dysfunction, such as in the aging and fibrotic heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207