MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044407826

Cretaceous to Tertiary tectono-thermal evolution of the Laurentian margin in Quebec, Canada-Preliminary results -

2002· article· en· W3044407826 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ulrich A. Glasmacher, A. López Martínez, Angelo Tremblay, Marcos Zentilli, G. Wagner, María del Socorro Balcázar

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotemas ( Madrid ) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySiliciclasticMetamorphismOrdovicianPaleontologyDevonianBasementPrecambrianRiftUnconformityCratonNappeGeochemistrySedimentary rockTectonicsStructural basinArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Canadian Appalachians, the Laurentian margin (i.e. the Humber zone of Williams 1979) is separated into two subzones, external and internal, based on contrasting deformation style and metamorphic intensity. In southern Quebec, the external Humber zone consists of siliciclastic rocks, limestones and mafic volcanic rocks that are deformed into a series of imbricated northwest-directed thrust nappes. Rock units vary from unmetamorphosed to sub-greenschistfacies of metamorphism. Towards the northwest non-deformed Cambrian and Ordovician siliciclastic rocks and limestones of the St. Lawrence Lowlands overlay the Precambrian basement of the Canadian Shield. The Post-Devonian thermo-tectonic evolution of the eastern margin of the Canadian Shield, the St. Lawrence Lowlands and the external Humber zone is only sparsely known. Along the Chaudiere River transect (external Humber zone) apatite fission track pooled ages range from 136± 11 Ma to 167 ± I l Ma and along the Montmorency transect (St. Lawrence Lowlands to Canadian Shield) from 122 ± 9 Ma to 156 ±11 Ma. At the Montmorency normal fault the apatite FT-age of the hanging wall is 34 Ma younger than the apatite FT-age of the footwall. This age difference is interpreted in the frame of the development of the St. Lawrence River rift system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotemas ( Madrid )Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207