MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044490527 · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.02.028

Preoperative prediction of Bleeding Independently associated with Mortality after noncardiac Surgery (BIMS): an international prospective cohort study

2020· letter· en· W3044490527 on OpenAlexafffund
Pavel S Roshanov, Gordon Guyatt, Vikas Tandon, Flávia K. Borges, André Lamy, Richard Whitlock, Bruce Biccard, Wojciech Szczeklik, Mohamed Panju, Jessica Spence, Amit X. Garg, Michael McGillion, John W. Eikelboom, Daniel I. Sessler, Clive Kearon, Mark Crowther, Tomas VanHelder, Peter A. Kavsak, Justin de Beer, Mitchell Winemaker, Yannick Le Manach, Tej Sheth, Jehonathan H. Pinthus, Deborah Siegal, Lehana Thabane, Marko Šimunović, Ryszard Mizera, Sebastián Ribas, P.J. Devereaux

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Anaesthesia · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research InstituteInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesImpactPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences Centre
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaUniversidad Industrial de SantanderFundación Cardioinfantil - Instituto de CardiologíaUniversidad Autónoma de BucaramangaUniversiti MalayaAbbott LaboratoriesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDaiichi-SankyoMcMaster UniversityRoche DiagnosticsHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaManitoba Health Research CouncilOctapharmaHamilton Health SciencesAlexion PharmaceuticalsConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoGlaxoSmithKlineCovidienPfizerJanssen BiotechUniversity of ManitobaDaiichi Sankyo EuropeAbbott DiagnosticsLEO PharmaLEO Pharma Research FoundationBayerEli Lilly and CompanyNational Health and Medical Research CouncilOrtho Clinical DiagnosticsAstraZenecaStrykerBeckman Coulter FoundationSanofiFundació la Marató de TV3Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliPopulation Health Research InstituteAmerican Heart AssociationMinistério da SaúdeUniversité Pierre et Marie CurieAustralian and New Zealand College of AnaesthetistsPortola PharmaceuticalsManitoba Medical Service FoundationInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsMedicineProspective cohort studyCohortCohort studyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of AnaesthesiaSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207