Simultaneous choroidal and conjunctival metastases from renal cell carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 50-year-old male patient was referred for an assessment of a choroidal lesion in the right eye. He also noticed a rapidly growing caruncle lesion about 2 weeks prior to his visit. His medical history was remarkable for metastatic diseases from clear cell renal carcinoma 1 year before. On ophthalmic evaluation, his visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Anterior segment examination of the right eye showed a red protruding mass at the caruncle [Fig. 1]. Dilated fundus examination demonstrated an amelanotic choroidal lesion at the inferior temporal arcade [Fig. 2]. Ultrasound examination identified a dome-shaped choroidal tumor, with medium internal reflectivity [Fig. 3]. The left eye examination was normal. The caruncle tumor was excised totally. Histopathological examination revealed nests of clear cells with abundant cytoplasm, which confirmed a metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [Fig. 4]. The right eye was treated with radiotherapy in addition to the second line of systemic targeted therapy. There is no recurrence of conjunctival tumor or choroidal tumors 18 months after treatment [Fig. 5].Figure 1: Anterior segment examination of the right eye showed a red protruding mass at caruncleFigure 2: Dilated fundus examination demonstrated an amelanotic choroidal lesion measuring 5 mm in diameter at inferior temporal fundusFigure 3: Ultrasound examination revealed a domed shaped choroidal tumor, 2.9 mm in thickness with variable internal reflectivityFigure 4: The histopathological examination of the excised caruncle tumor revealed nests of clear cells with abundant cytoplasm, which was conclusive of a metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the caruncleFigure 5: There is no recurrence of conjunctival tumorDiscussion Choroidal metastasis from RCC accounts for only 3% of all choroidal metastases.[123] There were only three cases of conjunctival metastasis from RCC reported in the literature.[45] Two cases presented with a unilateral conjunctival mass as the first presentation of RCC. The third case presented with bilateral choroidal metastases from RCC and developed bilateral conjunctival metastases 6 months later. This is a patient who has an advanced stage of RCC, which is refractory to first-line targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The biopsy of the tumor at caruncle confirmed the nature of the intraocular tumor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case to describe concurrent conjunctival and choroidal metastases from RCC, which may represent a more aggressive phenotype of RCC, and requires close monitoring of advanced disease. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".