Cauda equina syndrome as the initial presentation of uveal melanoma metastasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Uveal melanoma extension to the central nervous system (CNS) is exceedingly rare, and can occur through optic nerve invasion. We report a rare clinical case that presented with cauda equina syndrome as the initial manifestation of metastasis of choroidal melanoma, and showed neurotropic extension by histopathology. Our patient did not demonstrate any evidence of systemic metastasis otherwise. OBSERVATIONS: A 60-year-old male patient with treated choroidal melanoma in his right eye, with presumed clinical control, developed radiation-induced neovascular glaucoma refractory to medical therapy. The eye required enucleation for pain control. One month post-enucleation, he presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain, urine retention, constipation, and leg weakness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine showed extensive leptomeningeal involvement along the entire spinal cord and the cauda equina. On further inquisition, the patient noted prior visual field defect in the contralateral eye. Brain MRI revealed intracranial metastasis with chiasmal involvement. The patient underwent radiotherapy for the brain and spine to improve his symptoms, and was ultimately transferred to palliative care. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: Optic nerve invasion in uveal melanoma may lead to neurotropic spread of melanoma cells with risk of intracranial and spinal cord metastasis. Neurological symptoms should raise the suspicion of clinicians regarding this complication, which is associated with increased melanoma-related mortality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".