MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045240113 · doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1763761

COVID-19 reveals the systemic nature of urban health globally

2020· article· en· W3045240113 on OpenAlexafffund
Franz Gatzweiler, Bojie Fu, Céline Rozenblat, Huey-Jen Su, Isaac Luginaah, Jason Corburn, Jo Ivey Boufford, Juan Vela Valdés, Blaise Nguendo-Yongsi, Philippa Howden‐Chapman, R. B. Singh, Rachel Cooper, Tolu Oni, Yong‐Guan Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueCities & Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCentral Food Technological Research Institute, Council of Scientific and Industrial ResearchInstitute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesMedical Research CouncilAfrican Academy of SciencesUniversity of Cape TownInternational Science CouncilUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of DelhiInternational Atomic Energy AgencyChinese Academy of SciencesGovernment of the United KingdomNational Cheng Kung UniversityUniversity of St. ThomasEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilYork UniversityUniversidad Autónoma de SinaloaUniversity of Otago
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Statement (logic)Action (physics)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceMedicineVirologyLawPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statement by the scientific committee* of the International Science Council’s Programme on Urban Health and Wellbeing, on critical elements of urban health action in response to the epidemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCities & HealthSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207