MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045264265 · doi:10.1038/s41436-020-0898-y

De novo SMARCA2 variants clustered outside the helicase domain cause a new recognizable syndrome with intellectual disability and blepharophimosis distinct from Nicolaides–Baraitser syndrome

2020· article· en· W3045264265 on OpenAlexaff
Camille Sayou, Pauline Le Tanno, Émilie Tisserant, Ange‐Line Bruel, Sara El Kennani, Joaquim Sá, Karen Low, Cristina Dias, Markéta Havlovičová, Miroslava Hančárová, Evan E. Eichler, Françoise Devillard, Sébastien Moutton, Julien Van‐Gils, Christèle Dubourg, Sylvie Odent, Bénédicte Gérard, Amélie Piton, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Nobuhiko Okamoto, Helen V. Firth, Kay Metcalfe, Anna Moh, Kimberly A. Chapman, Erfan Aref‐Eshghi, Jennifer Kerkhof, Annalaura Torella, Vincenzo Nigro, Laurence Perrin, Juliette Piard, Gwenaël Le Guyader, Thibaud Jouan, Christel Thauvin‐Robinet, Yannis Duffourd, Jaya K. George‐Abraham, Catherine A. Buchanan, Denise Williams, Usha Kini, Kate Wilson, Nicola Brunetti‐Pierri, Giorgio Casari, Francesco Musacchia, Margherita Mutarelli, Diego Carrella, Giuseppina Vitiello, Valeria Capra, Giancarlo Parenti, Vincenzo Leuzzi, Angelo Selicorni, Silvia Maitz, Sandro Banfi, Marcella Zollino, Mario Montomoli, Donatelli Milani, Corrado Romano, Albina Tummolo, Daniele De Brasi, Antonietta Coppola, Claudia Santoro, Angela Peron, Chiara Pantaleoni, Raffaele Castello, Stefano D’Arrigo, Sérgio B. Sousa, Raoul C. M. Hennekam, Bekim Sadiković, Julien Thevenon, Jérôme Govin, Antonio Vitobello

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics in Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsVictoria HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAgence Nationale de la RechercheFrancis Crick InstituteWellcome Trust
KeywordsBlepharophimosisGeneticsBiologyPhenotypeSWI/SNFIntellectual disabilityChromatin remodelingDNA methylationChromatinGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGenetics in MedicineSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207