MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045421435 · doi:10.21608/mjae.2012.102337

DEVELOPING ON-FARM IRRIGATION SCHEMES FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE CLIMATE CONDITIONS ON THE WESTERN BANK OF LAKE NASSER

2012· article· en· W3045421435 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Samar Attaher

Bibliographic record

VenueMisr journal of agricultural engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)IrrigationWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceClimate changeGeographyAgricultural economicsBusinessOceanographyEconomicsGeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The agricultural region in the western bank of Lake Nasser is one of the new promising agricultural settlements, which has the advantage of early-season production of several high quality cash crops. The agriculture production in this region is fully-irrigated, and constrained by sever environmental, biophysical and socio- economical conditions. Moreover, farmers have been facing several additional challenges in irrigation management due to lack of knowledge of the best practices. The aim of this study is to evaluate the current farmers’ irrigation schemes in terms of water productivity. The study examined some possible irrigation schemes in order to improve water productivity with minimum irrigation requirement and to cope with projected water shortage and temperature increase induced by climate change. The study is based on modeling approach utilizing the FAO crop model “AquaCrop” on drip irrigated tomato. It was performed (i) to calibrate AquaCrop via two field trials at two seasons, (ii) to observe and evaluate the current farmers’ irrigation schemes based on fixed application frequency, and (iii) to evaluate six irrigation schemes under current and future climate conditions. The evaluated schemes included different combinations between net irrigation application and deficit practices at two levels of 80% and 60% of net water requirements, under current and future climate conditions, based on the change in irrigation application and water productivity. The results demonstrated that the combination of deficit irrigation levels and irrigation scheduling could improve tomato water productivity to the optimal level determined under the current study conditions (2.4 kg/m3), especially when deficit levels of 80 and 60% applied at both early and late stages of crop growth stages. These schemes could present acceptable adaptation options with the projected temperature increase due to climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMisr journal of agricultural engineeringSame topicIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207