MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045439668 · doi:10.1115/1.4047851

Pulsed Eddy Current Response to General Corrosion in Concrete Rebar

2020· article· en· W3045439668 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nondestructive Evaluation Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRebarMaterials scienceEddy currentCorrosionComposite materialExponential decayTransient (computer programming)RADIUSTransient responseStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Corrosion of carbon steel rebar in concrete structures, such as highway bridges and buildings, has a direct impact on their structural integrity since the rebar provides the tensile strength within the structure. Rebar strength depends on the remaining effective radius of a given rod. Long-time decay up to 0.1 s, in the transient response of pulsed eddy current (PEC), was examined as a potential method to quantify general corrosion in ferromagnetic rebar. The transient response of a coaxial solenoidal drive–receive coil pair, oriented parallel to the rebar axis, was analyzed over a range of distances into the concrete (liftoff) and rebar radii. At long times, the single exponential decay constant was largely independent of liftoff. A power law relationship for the characteristic decay time, consistent with long-time diffusion of electromagnetic fields into a rod, was observed. The intercept of a best-fit line to measured voltage decay decreased exponentially with liftoff and maintained a measurable response up to 110 mm distance for a 25 mm (1 in.) diameter rebar. This exponential decay was present in 22 mm (7/8 in.), 19 mm (3/4 in.), and 15 mm (5/8 in.) samples as well. Reported results demonstrate the potential for PEC to quantify remaining cross-sectional area of rebar in concrete structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it