MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045491395 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01895

Don’t Walk So Close to Me: Physical Distancing and Adult Physical Activity in Canada

2020· article· en· W3045491395 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Katie M. Di Sebastiano, Tala Chulak-Bozzer, Leigh M. Vanderloo, Guy Faulkner

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMitacsPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsPandemicDeclarationPhysical activitySocial distanceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyDistancingRepeated measures designMedicineGerontologyPhysical therapyComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, physical distancing measures have been implemented globally. Canadians have been instructed to stay at home which has likely resulted in significant changes in their physical activity. Using data from a national physical activity tracking app (PAC app), we aimed to determine device-measured physical activity levels immediately prior to and following the implementation of physical distancing measures in Canada to provide evidence for the development of physical activity recommendations for future pandemics or second-wave infections. Methods: Demographic and physical activity data were extracted from the PAC app, using a 10-week (10 February to 19 April 2020) quasi-experimental design to determine changes in physical activity 4 weeks pre- and 6 weeks post-pandemic declaration. Weekly physical activity levels were monitored through wearable fitness trackers and health apps linked to the PAC app, to record moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity (LPA), and steps. Repeated measure ANOVA were used to determine changes over time (mean  SE). Findings: A total of 2,338 Canadians who were mostly 35-44 years old (26.6%), and female (90.2%) were included in the analysis. MVPA, LPA, and steps significantly declined immediately following the declaration of the pandemic (MVPA: pre-pandemic: 194.25.2 min, post-pandemic: 176.75.0min, p<0.001; LPA: pre-pandemic: 1000.517.0min, post-pandemic: 874.115.6min, p<0.001; steps: pre-pandemic: 48,625745 steps, post-pandemic: 43395705 steps, p<0.001). However, 6 weeks following pandemic declaration, MVPA (week 6: 204.45.4 min, p=0.498) had returned to pre-pandemic levels. LPA (week 6: 732.014.3 min, p=<0.001) and steps (week 6: 41,946763, p<0.001) remained significantly lower than pre-pandemic levels at week 6. Interpretation: Although MVPA returned to pre-pandemic levels, significant and sustained declines in incidental LPA and steps were observed. Attenuating the loss of incidental physical activity should be a public health priority in response to future pandemics or a second wave of a COVID-19 infection, as it may have significant long-term implications for the physical and mental health of Canadians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychologySame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207