MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045544993 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01397

Foraging at Solid Urban Waste Disposal Sites as Risk Factor for Cephalosporin and Colistin Resistant Escherichia coli Carriage in White Storks (Ciconia ciconia)

2020· article· en· W3045544993 on OpenAlexafffund
Úrsula Höfle, Juan José González‐López, María Cruz Camacho, Marc Solà-Ginés, ALBERT J. MORENO, José Manuel Hernández, Javier de la Puente, Javier Pineda‐Pampliega, José I. Aguirre, Fernando Torres‐Medina, A. Ramis, Natàlia Majó, Julio Blas, Lourdes Migura‐García

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersEuropean Social FundInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaUniversidad Complutense de MadridInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIFundació Institut de Recerca Hospital Universitari Vall d’HebronOrganismo Autónomo de Parques NacionalesMinisterio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de EspañaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadGeneralitat de CatalunyaCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaComunidad de MadridUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologyEscherichia coliVeterinary medicineCephalosporinResistomeMicrobiologyZoologyEcologyIntegronGeneticsGeneAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ciconia ciconia (white stork) may act as a reservoir and vehicle of cephalosporin resistant (CR) Escherichia coli. Between 2011 and 2014, we sampled white storks from colonies exposed to different degrees of anthropic pressure across the major areas of natural distribution of white storks in Spain. Cloacal swab samples (n=467) were obtained from individuals belonging to twelve different colonies from six different regions. Additionally, 70 samples were collected from recently deposited droppings at the base of nesting platforms. We phenotypically characterized E. coli isolates, confirmed presence of CR genes and classified plasmids. Risk factors for acquiring these genes were assessed. Overall, 8.8% (41 out of 467) storks carried CR E. coli in their cloaca and five (7.1%) were identified from recently deposited droppings; therefore, 46 isolates were further characterized. Of them 20 contained blaCTX-M-1, nine blaCMY-2, six blaCTX-M-14, four blaSHV-12, three blaCTX-M-15, two blaCTX-M-32, one blaCTX-M-1 together with blaCMY-2, and one blaCTX-M-1 together with blaSHV-12. All were multidrug-resistant, and four harboured the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-1 gene. CR genes were associated with the presence of IncI1, IncFIB and IncN replicon families. XbaI-macrorestriction analysis revealed a great diversity among most of the XbaI-PFGE types, but indistinguishable types were also seen with isolates obtained from different locations. Clonal complex 10 was the most common among CR E. coli and two blaCTX-M-15 positive isolates were identified as B2-ST131. Carriage of CR E. coli was significantly higher in colonies located close to solid urban waste disposal sites in which foraging on human waste was more likely and in one case to cattle grazing. The co-occurrence of blaCMY-2 and mcr-1 on plasmids of E. coli isolated from wild birds as early as 2011 is of note as the earliest previous report of mcr-1 in wild birds is from 2016. Our study shows that foraging at landfills and in association to cattle grazing are important risk factors for the acquisition of CR E. coli in white storks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MicrobiologySame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207