Study of the Physical and Chemical Properties of the Compost Produced from Sawani Composting Plant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, monthly and freshly produced composite (morning, noon, and afternoon) compost samples were collected from Tripoli Organic Fertilizer Production Plant (composting facility). The physical, and chemical properties of the compost were investigated for one year starting from April of 2004 and on results of physical tests indicated that compost was not fully mature and contained higher percentage of foreign matters such as glass, and plastic than the suggested international standards. The average moisture content and water holding capacity were 59%, and 100% respectively. The water extract (1: 2.5) of the compost had an average PH of 6.6, and EC of 14.47 dm/m at 25°C. The average total content of N, P, and K were 0.77%, 82.3%, and 3866.7 mg/kg respectively. The average organic carbon and the organic matter content were 21%, and 37.87% respectively, while the C/N ratio was 1: 32. The average total concentration of trace elements , and heavy metals namely Fe , Cu , Zn , Mn , Pb , Ni , Cr , Cd , As , and Hg were determined , and were generally lower than the levels indicated by the quality control agencies , and organizations in most of the European Union Countries , USA , and Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".