MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3045859815 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.201764

How Canada can better embed randomized trials into clinical care

2020· article· en· W3045859815 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Srinivas Murthy, Robert Fowler, Andreas Laupacis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoFowler Kennedy Sport Medicine ClinicUniversity of British ColumbiaSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health care2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Randomized controlled trialPandemicMEDLINEMedicineAlternative medicineFamily medicineData scienceDiseaseComputer sciencePolitical scienceInfectious disease (medical specialty)VirologyPathologyOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an impressive scientific and organizational feat, researchers, health care workers and patients in the United Kingdom rapidly generated evidence that has transformed the care of patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) worldwide. In so doing they have provided an example that Canada should

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.625
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.802
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.6250.802
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.009
Bibliometrics0.0130.017
Science and technology studies0.0080.025
Scholarly communication0.0330.024
Open science0.0170.024
Research integrity0.0360.047
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207