Carbocyclic Substrate Analogues Reveal Kanosamine Biosynthesis Begins with the α-Anomer of Glucose 6-Phosphate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
and other closely-related bacteria. The NtdC-catalyzed reaction is unusual because 3oG6P undergoes rapid ring opening, resulting in a 1,3-dicarbonyl compound that is inherently unstable due to enolate formation. We have reported the steady-state kinetic behavior of NtdC, but many questions remain about the nature of this reaction, including whether it is the α-anomer, β-anomer, or open-chain form that is the substrate for the enzyme. Here, we report the synthesis of carbocyclic G6P analogues by two routes, one based upon the Ferrier II rearrangement to generate the carbocycle and one based upon a Claisen rearrangement. We were able to synthesize both pseudo-anomers of carbaglucose 6-phosphate (C6P) using the Ferrier approach, and activity assays revealed that the pseudo-α-anomer is a good substrate for NtdC, while the pseudo-β-anomer and the open-chain analogue, sorbitol 6-phosphate (S6P), are not substrates. A more efficient synthesis of α-C6P was achieved using the Claisen rearrangement approach, which allowed for a thorough evaluation of the NtdC-catalyzed oxidation of α-C6P. The requirement for the α-anomer indicates that NtdC and NtdA, the subsequent enzyme in the pathway, have co-evolved to recognize the α-anomer in order to avoid mutarotation between enzymatic steps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".