Study of translaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional flax/epoxy composite
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ever growing applications of flax fiber-reinforced composites (FFRCs) and their suitability for structural uses involve implementing the design and failure criteria for these composites. Translaminar fracture is one of the primary failure modes of unidirectional (UD) fiber-reinforced composites, and measuring it is essential for design purposes and in many material failure studies. However, the translaminar fracture parameters have not been evaluated for UD-FFRCs; thus, there is no data available in the literature. Moreover, conventional test methods for this failure mode are complex, and there is no standard method for measuring this value in compression. In this study, the translaminar fracture behavior of a UD flax/epoxy composite has been examined, and its fracture toughness in tension and compression in the fiber direction are determined following existing standard methods as well as using a methodology developed using infrared thermography. Compact tension specimens were adapted and used for this purpose. A fractographic study is conducted to examine the fracture surfaces and better understand the failure mechanisms. For tensile tests, the results of infrared thermography are in good agreement with those of ASTM E1922 and lie in the range of values obtained for similar composites in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it