APOBEC2 is a Transcriptional Repressor required for proper Myoblast Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The activation induced cytidine deaminase/apolipoprotein B editing complex (AID/APOBEC) family comprises several nucleic acid editors with roles ranging from antibody diversification to mRNA editing. APOBEC2, an evolutionarily conserved member of this family, has neither an established substrate nor a mechanism of action, however genetic evidence suggests functional relevance in tissues such as muscle. Here, we demonstrate that in muscle, APOBEC2 does not have any of the attributed molecular functions of the AID/APOBEC family, such as RNA editing, DNA demethylation, or DNA mutation. Instead, we show that APOBEC2 occupies chromatin at promoter regions of certain genes, whose expression is repressed during muscle cell differentiation. We further demonstrate that APOBEC2 on one hand binds promoter region DNA directly and in a sequence specific fashion, while on the other it interacts with HDAC transcriptional corepressor complexes. Therefore, APOBEC2, by actively repressing the expression of non-myogenesis pathway genes, plays a key role in enforcing the proper establishment of muscle cell fate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".