Frequency of the loss of CAA interruption in the HTT CAG tract and implications for Huntington disease in the reduced penetrance range
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: In some Huntington disease (HD) patients, the "loss of interruption" (LOI) variant eliminates an interrupting codon in the HTT CAG-repeat tract, which causes earlier age of onset (AOO). The magnitude of this effect is uncertain, since previous studies included few LOI carriers, and the variant also causes CAG size misestimation. We developed a rapid LOI detection screen, enabling unbiased frequency estimation among manifest HD patients. Additionally, we combined published data with clinical data from newly identified patients to accurately characterize the LOI's effect on AOO. METHODS: We developed a LOI detection polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, and screened patients to estimate the frequency of the LOI variant and its effect on AOO. RESULTS: Mean onset for LOI carriers (n = 49) is 20.4 years earlier than expected based on diagnosed CAG size. After correcting for CAG size underestimation, the variant is still associated with onset 9.5 years earlier. The LOI is present in 1.02% of symptomatic HD patients, and in 32.2% of symptomatic reduced penetrance (RP) range patients (36-39 CAGs). CONCLUSION: The LOI causes significantly earlier onset, greater than expected by CAG length, particularly in persons with 36-39 CAG repeats. Detection of this variant has implications for HD families, especially for those in the RP range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".