MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046339673 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.06.016

De Novo and Bi-allelic Pathogenic Variants in NARS1 Cause Neurodevelopmental Delay Due to Toxic Gain-of-Function and Partial Loss-of-Function Effects

2020· article· en· W3046339673 on OpenAlexaff
Andreea Manole, Stéphanie Efthymiou, Emer O’Connor, Marisa I. Mendes, Matthew J. Jennings, Reza Maroofian, Indran Davagnanam, Kshitij Mankad, Maria Rodríguez‐López, Vincenzo Salpietro, Ricardo Harripaul, Lauren Badalato, Jagdeep S. Walia, Christopher S. Francklyn, Alkyoni Athanasiou‐Fragkouli, Roisin Sullivan, Sonal Desai, Kristin Barañano, Faisal Zafar, Nuzhat Rana, Muhammad Ilyas, Alejandro Horga, Majdi Kara, Francesca Mattioli, Alice Goldenberg, Helen Griffin, Amélie Piton, Lindsay B. Henderson, Benyekhlef Kara, Ayça Dilruba Aslanger, Joost Raaphorst, Rolph Pfundt, R Portier, Marwan Shinawi, Amelia Kirby, Katherine Christensen, Lu Wang, Rasim Özgür Rosti, Sohail Aziz Paracha, Muhammad Tahir Sarwar, Dagan Jenkins, Jawad Ahmed, Federico Santoni, Emmanuelle Ranza, Justyna Iwaszkiewicz, Cheryl Cytrynbaum, Rosanna Weksberg, Ingrid M. Wentzensen, María J. Guillen Sacoto, Yue Si, Aida Telegrafi, Marisa V. Andrews, Dustin Baldridge, Heinz Gabriel, Julia Mohr, Barbara Oehl‐Jaschkowitz, Sylvain Debard, Bruno Senger, Frédéric Fischer, Conny van Ravenwaaij, Annemarie Fock, Servi J.C. Stevens, Jürg Bähler, Amina Nasar, John F. Mantovani, Adnan Manzur, Anna Sarkozy, Desirée E.C. Smith, Gajja S. Salomons, Zubair M. Ahmed, S. Riazuddin, Saima Riazuddin, Muhammad A. Usmani, Annette Seibt, Muhammad Ansar, Stylianos E. Antonarakis, John B. Vincent, Muhammad Ayub, Mona Grimmel, Anne Marie Jelsig, Tina Duelund Hjortshøj, Helena Gásdal Karstensen, Marybeth Hummel, Tobias B. Haack, Yalda Jamshidi, Felix Distelmaier, Rita Horváth, Joseph G. Gleeson, H. D. Becker, Jean-Louis Mandel, David A. Koolen, Henry Houlden

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenQueen's UniversityUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMedical Research CouncilUniversity College LondonBrain Research UKEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRosetrees TrustMuscular Dystrophy UKWellcome TrustAtaxia UKMuscular Dystrophy Association
KeywordsBiologyTransfer RNAMicrocephalyAlleleLoss functionGeneticsAminoacyl tRNA synthetaseCompound heterozygosityMutationAtaxiaFrameshift mutationTranslation (biology)Neurodevelopmental disorderGeneMessenger RNAPhenotypeRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) are ubiquitous, ancient enzymes that charge amino acids to cognate tRNA molecules, the essential first step of protein translation. Here, we describe 32 individuals from 21 families, presenting with microcephaly, neurodevelopmental delay, seizures, peripheral neuropathy, and ataxia, with de novo heterozygous and bi-allelic mutations in asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (NARS1). We demonstrate a reduction in NARS1 mRNA expression as well as in NARS1 enzyme levels and activity in both individual fibroblasts and induced neural progenitor cells (iNPCs). Molecular modeling of the recessive c.1633C>T (p.Arg545Cys) variant shows weaker spatial positioning and tRNA selectivity. We conclude that de novo and bi-allelic mutations in NARS1 are a significant cause of neurodevelopmental disease, where the mechanism for de novo variants could be toxic gain-of-function and for recessive variants, partial loss-of-function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207