MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046527313 · doi:10.1002/jctb.6544

The removal of inorganic phosphate from water using carboxymethyl cellulose‐iron hydrogel beads

2020· article· en· W3046527313 on OpenAlexaff
David Ure, Bülent Mutus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboxymethyl celluloseChemistryNuclear chemistryPhosphateCelluloseSelf-healing hydrogelsSodiumPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is key to improved crop yields; however, agricultural drainage leads to the accumulation of this nutrient in aquatic ecosystems and promotes the formation of harmful algal blooms. The aim of this study was to produce a hydrogel with high binding capacity and affinity towards Pi produced from carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and iron (III) chloride (FeCl3). RESULTS CMC was converted to CMC‐Fe composites by incubation with FeCl3. The half‐lives (t1/2) of CMC functionalization with 25 mmol L−1 FeCl3 were 11.56 min (1.5% CMC) and 13.91 min (3.0% CMC). The apparent dissociation constants (KD App) of CMC‐Fe were estimated to be 33.99 μmol L−1 (1.5% CMCFe) and 24.81 μmol L−1 (3.0% CMC‐Fe). The phosphate binding capacity (PBC) of the hydrated hydrogels were 74.0 ± 3.06 mg g−1 (1.5% CMCFe) and 91.4 ± 4.51 mg g−1 (3.0% CMC‐Fe). Laboratory‐scale continuous flow filtration studies showed an average removal of 91.3% (mixed filter) and 52.5% (unmixed filter). Batch type treatment of agricultural drainage showed a reduction in Pi content from 0.40 to 0.11 mg L−1 (1.5% CMC‐Fe) and 0.17 mg L−1 (3.0% CMC‐Fe). The amount of bound‐Pi was 26.7 ± 0.63 μg g−1 (1.5% CMC‐Fe) and 32.8 ± 1.31 μg g−1 (3.0% CMC‐Fe). The iron leached from 1.5% and 3.0% CMC‐Fe beads was 11.98 ± 1.80 and 3.57 ± 1.63 mg g−1, respectively. CONCLUSION The CMC‐Fe hydrogel shows great promise as a Pi‐adsorbing material with applications in the treatment of agricultural drainage. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Technology & BiotechnologySame topicPhosphorus and nutrient managementFrench-language works237,207