Contingency between Historical Substitutions in the Acetylcholine Receptor Pore
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human adult muscle-type acetylcholine receptors incorporating a reconstructed ancestral β-subunit exhibit reduced single-channel conductance when compared to wild-type. The ancestral and wild-type β-subunits differ by 132 amino acids, including substitution of residues that line the lumen of the channel pore, near its narrowest constriction. Here we show that a single historical substitution in this region of the ancestral β-subunit accounts for the difference in conductance. Furthermore, the contribution of the substituted residue to conductance is dependent upon its ancestral or wild-type background, and it can be modulated by a neighboring residue that has also evolved throughout the β-subunit history. Using an expanded molecular phylogeny, we track the order in which these two mutations occurred and then show that the order in which they are installed upon the ancestral, but not the human, background determines their individual contribution to conductance. Our results show how the contribution of amino acids to acetylcholine receptor conductance is contingent upon their evolutionary history and that the order in which substitutions occurred was important for shaping conductance in the modern-day receptor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it