Bone Mineral Density in Adults With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Decreased bone mineral density (BMD) is a concern in patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) due to lifelong glucocorticoid replacement. Studies till date have yielded conflicting results. We wanted to systematically evaluate the available evidence regarding BMD in adult patients with CAH. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify eligible studies. Studies comparing BMD in CAH patients with age- and sex-matched controls were included. Age less than 16 years and absence of controls were exclusion criteria. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts, read full-text articles, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using Newcastle-Ottawa scale and determined level of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Results: Nine case-control studies with a total sample size of 598 (cases n=254, controls n=344) met eligibility criteria. Total body BMD (Mean Difference [MD]-0.06; 95%CI -0.07, -0.04), lumbar spine BMD (MD -0.05; 95%CI -0.07, -0.03) and femoral neck BMD (MD -0.07; 95%CI -0.10, -0.05) was lower in cases compared to controls. Lumbar spine T-scores (MD -0.86; 95%CI -1.16, -0.56) and Z-scores (MD -0.66; 95%CI -0.99, -0.32) and femoral neck T-scores (MD -0.75 95%CI -0.95, -0.56) and Z-scores (MD -0.27 95%CI -0.58, 0.04) were also lower in cases compared to controls. No clear correlation between BMD and glucocorticoid dose was found. Conclusion: BMD in adult patients with CAH was lower compared to controls. Although no clear dose-response relationship between glucocorticoid dose and BMD was found, it would be prudent to avoid over-treatment with glucocorticoids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.026 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".