MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3046882170 · doi:10.18331/sfs2020.7.1.7

Estimation of growth parameters and mortality rate of Upeneus sulphureus (Cuvier, 1829) in the Persian Gulf ecosystem

2020· article· en· W3046882170 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arezoo Vahabnezhad, S.A. Taghavi Motlagh, Ali Salarpouri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersianEstimationFisheryBiologyPhilosophyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population parameters were estimated for goatfish (Upeneus sulphureus, Cuvier, 1829) as a small size and abundant species in the Persian Gulf ecosystem. A method of Tropfish R package based on length frequencies analysis was used. A total of 520 fish samples were taken monthly from landing stations in the coastal area of Iranian Waters in the Persian Gulf (Bushehr coasts) from January 2017 to December 2018. The length (FL) of the captured fishes varied from 8.5 to 17 cm with an average (±SD) of 11.20 (±2.24) cm.The values of the von Bertalanffy growth function fit length frequency data for U. sulphureus (combined sex) were estimated, as k = 1.2 per year, L∞ =19.43 cm (LF). Total, natural and fishing mortality calculated, as Z=3.74 per year, M=2.21 per year and F=1.53 per year, respectively. The exploitation ratio (E) was estimated at 0.4.The length-weight relationships of both sexes was estimated as, Log = -1.707+3.00 log (r = 0.92) which exhibited positive isometric growth. According to results, it could be concluded that goatfish (Upeneus sulphreus) is a relatively fast-growing and short-lived species. Although this species is not a direct target of fishermen, its ecological role in the Persian Gulf's food web due to their high abundance and high growth rate is undeniable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.079 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences→Same topicFish Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→