Nonlinear optics of optomagnetics: Quantum and classical treatments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optomagnetics emerges as a growing field of research cross-linking optics, magnetism, and material science. Here we provide a microscopic quantum-mechanical and a macroscopic classical model to describe an optomagnetic medium, i.e., optical gyration coefficient from a nonlinear optics point of view. Our self-consistent quantum-mechanical formulation considers all orders of perturbing field and results not only in finding generalized Pitaevskii's relationship, where photoinduced magnetization can be expanded in terms of light power, but also provides compact and analytical expressions for optical gyration vector coefficients. Classical treatment is then developed based on the anharmonic Drude-Lorentz model showing that the photoinduced DC magnetization is proportional to odd harmonics of the light power. The difference in quantum and classical results is revealed and discussed. Having a pump-probe setup in mind, we describe how a probe light signal can propagate down an optomagnetic medium, i.e., a medium that is magnetized by intense circularly polarized pump light, via its permittivity tensor and find light propagation characteristics. Inverse Faraday and Cotton-Mouton effects are discussed as a result of circular and linear birefringences and their Verdet constants have been analytically found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it