MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3046964403 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-a41

Abstract A41: Novel mithramycin analogues with improved pharmacologic profile and efficacy in ETS transcription factor-driven tumors

2020· article· en· W3046964403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Markos Leggas, Joseph M. Eckenrode, Yang Liu, Abhisek Mandal, Reiya Hayden, Oleg V. Tsodikov, Jon S. Thorson, Jurgen Rorh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsETS transcription factor familyFLI1Transcription factorBiologyCancer researchChromosomal translocationCarcinogenesisFusion geneGene silencingSarcomaPromoterGeneMolecular biologyGene expressionGeneticsMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Chromosomal translocations of ETS family transcription factors (TF) are found in Ewing sarcoma, prostate cancer, and leukemia and lead to expression of aberrant ETS transcription factors driving tumorigenesis. Mithramycin (MTM) inhibits EWS-FLI1, the most common ETS-related TFs in Ewing sarcoma through interference at its DNA binding sites on promoters. However, MTM has a narrow therapeutic window marked by severe liver and hematologic toxicities and poor pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, as demonstrated recently in a pediatric clinical trial with Ewing sarcoma patients. Here, we sought to develop analogues with specificity toward ETS family TFs and improved pharmacologic properties. Methods: Guided by crystal structures of MTM/DNA/ETS, we used semisynthetic approaches to prepare a library of analogs by substitution on the 3-side chain of MTM-SA and MTM (analogs). To select analogs with specific activity toward cells with ETS-related chromosomal translocations, analog cytotoxicity was determined in TC32 cells before and after EWS-FLI1 silencing. To confirm selectivity, analogs were tested in a panel of Ewing sarcoma cell lines (n=8) expressing EWS-ETS translocations and compared to a panel of non-Ewing cell lines (n=9) that do not express these translocations. CETSA, FRET, and luciferase reporter assays were used to evaluate interactions with EWS-FLI1 and SP1 proteins and gene promoter regions they bind. Inhibition of select transcriptionally regulated genes was determined by qRT-PCR and immunoblotting. Select analogs were tested in vivo to assess PK in mice and primates, identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and determine dose-dependent efficacy in mouse xenograft models. Results: MTM analogs had higher GI50 in silenced EWS-FLI1 cells and > 10-fold lower GI50 in ETS-dependent cell lines vs. non-ETS dependent cancer cells, as compared to ~3-fold for MTM. Target engagement was demonstrated in dose-dependent manner using a luciferase reporter TC32 cell line under control of the NR0B1 promoter, which is regulated by EWS-FLI1, and CETSA experiments showed increased physical interaction of the analogs with EWS-FLI1 as compared to MTM. Treatment with MTM and analogs produced comparable dose-dependent displacement of an ETS DNA binding domain from GGAA (microsatellite-like) DNA fragments as demonstrated by FRET. Exposure to analogs led to concentration-dependent downregulation of EWS-FLI1 and Sp1 regulated genes. In vivo studies showed that MTM analogs attained higher exposure at their respective MTD and had lower clearance in mice and primates. Unlike MTM, analogs reversed tumor growth and increased survival at the MTD and 2/3 of MTD. Conclusion: We demonstrated that MTM analogs are selectively more cytotoxic in tumor cell lines dependent on ETS family TFs and have vastly improved PK properties as confirmed in a primate model. Given their effectiveness at 2/3 of the MTD, they are expected to have an improved therapeutic window. Citation Format: Markos Leggas, Joseph Eckenrode, Yang Liu, Abhisek Mandal, Reiya Hayden, Oleg Tsodikov, Jon Thorson, Jurgen Rorh. Novel mithramycin analogues with improved pharmacologic profile and efficacy in ETS transcription factor-driven tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr A41.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207