Primordial Radius Gap and Potentially Broad Core Mass Distributions of Super-Earths and Sub-Neptunes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The observed radii distribution of Kepler exoplanets reveals two distinct populations: those that are more likely to be terrestrials (≲1.7 R ⊕ ) and those that are more likely to be gas-enveloped (≳2 R ⊕ ). There exists a clear gap in the distribution of radii that separates these two kinds of planets. Mass-loss processes like photoevaporation by high-energy photons from the host star have been proposed as natural mechanisms to carve out this radius valley. These models favor underlying core mass function of sub-Neptunes that is sharply peaked at ∼4–8 M ⊕ , but the radial-velocity follow-up of these small planets hints at a more bottom-heavy mass function. By taking into account the initial gas accretion in gas-poor (but not gas-empty) nebula, we demonstrate that (1) the observed radius valley is a robust feature that is initially carved out at formation during late-time gas accretion; and (2) that it can be reconciled with core mass functions that are broad extending well into the sub-Earth regime. The maximally cooled isothermal limit prohibits cores lighter than ∼1–2 M ⊕ from accreting enough mass to appear gas-enveloped. The rocky-to-enveloped transition established at formation produces a gap in the radius distribution that shifts to smaller radii farther from the star, similar to that observed. For the best agreement with the data, our late-time gas accretion model favors dust-free accretion in hotter disks with cores slightly less dense than the Earth (∼0.8 ρ ⊕ ) drawn from a mass function that is as broad as .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".