Energy-aware Graph Job Allocation in Software Defined Air-Ground Integrated Vehicular Networks.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The software defined air-ground integrated vehicular (SD-AGV) networks have emerged as a promising paradigm, which realize the flexible on-ground resource sharing to support innovative applications for UAVs with heavy computational overhead. In this paper, we investigate a vehicular cloud-assisted graph job allocation problem in SD-AGV networks, where the computation-intensive jobs carried by UAVs, and the vehicular cloud are modeled as graphs. To map each component of the graph jobs to a feasible vehicle, while achieving the trade-off among minimizing UAVs' job completion time, energy consumption, and the data exchange cost among vehicles, we formulate the problem as a mixed-integer non-linear programming problem, which is Np-hard. Moreover, the constraint associated with preserving job structures poses addressing the subgraph isomorphism problem, that further complicates the algorithm design. Motivated by which, we propose an efficient decoupled approach by separating the template (feasible mappings between components and vehicles) searching from the transmission power allocation. For the former, we present an efficient algorithm of searching for all the subgraph isomorphisms with low computation complexity. For the latter, we introduce a power allocation algorithm by applying convex optimization techniques. Extensive simulations demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms the benchmark methods considering various problem sizes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".