Tidal Resonance in the Adriatic Sea: Observational Evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tides in the Adriatic Sea are anomalously strong in comparison with most of other parts of the Mediterranean Sea. Consequently, tides play a fundamental role in the hydrodynamics of this sea and in the formation of destructive floods in its northernmost part. The resonant character of the Adriatic tides is evident, but the exact mechanism of their formation has never been thoroughly examined. In the present study, we used multidecadal tide gauge data from 10 stations located along the basin's coastline to examine the spectral properties of the Adriatic Sea and to provide high‐resolution tidal analysis. Our results demonstrate that both diurnal and semidiurnal tidal harmonics are resonantly amplified due to the proximity of tidal periods to the periods of the fundamental (21.5 hr) and first (10.9 hr) Adriatic eigen modes, respectively. The constructed resonance models were found to closely describe specific features of the observed tides in the Adriatic Sea, including both major and minor harmonics, and therefore help to explain the dominant physical mechanism driving the floods in the northernmost part of the basin, including the Venice Lagoon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".