MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Star-Delta Connection Three-Stage Millimeter Wave Band LC Ring Oscillator

2020· article· en· W3047085269 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Bostani, Javad Yavand Hasani, Kamal El‐Sankary

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)InductanceOscillation (cell signaling)InductorPhysicsConnection (principal bundle)Equivalent series inductancePhase noiseElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsVoltageGeometryOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a new topology is proposed for a three-stage LC ring oscillator. First, it is shown that the conventional ring oscillator can be represented as a configuration of a star connection of inductors. Next, in the proposed topology, the star connection is replaced with a star-delta connection to increase the inductance value for a given oscillation frequency. This is desirable in millimeter-wave band frequencies, where the inductance value is very small and severely affected by parasitic and may entail limitations in foundry design kits. By using the delta connection of the inductors, a higher oscillation frequency is achieved for a given inductance. Analytic equations are presented to calculate the oscillation condition and frequency of oscillation in the proposed topology. Moreover, the proposed structure has a better phase noise performance at higher frequencies in comparison to conventional topology. The advantages of the proposed topology are examined by simulations using TSMC 0.18 um RF-CMOS technology. Simulations and analysis results show a 38.36% increase of oscillation frequency in the proposed topology compared to the conventional one with the same components and similar conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207