MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3047221384 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-a32

Abstract A32: Selective inhibition of AuroraA by LY3295668 erbumine in neuroblastoma models induces apoptosis through a combination of S-phase DNA damage and mitotic arrest

2020· article· en· W3047221384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michele Dowless, Jill D. Kremer, Caitlin D. Lowery, Xueqian Gong, Joseph Klahn, Jennifer R. Stephens, Yu‐Hua Hui, Wayne Blosser, Ricardo Martínez, Jian Du, Louis F. Stancato

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCancer researchMitosisDNA damageApoptosisCell cycleCell biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aurora kinase A (AuroraA) is a serine/threonine protein kinase critical for centrosome maturation, mitotic spindle formation, and spindle checkpoint activation. Aberrant expression of AuroraA promotes tumor initiation and disease progression, making it a promising therapeutic target in several cancer types. However, recent clinical trials of purported selective AuroraA inhibitors failed due to lack of efficacy and/or hematologic toxicity, likely due to concurrent inhibition of Aurora kinase B (AuroraB). Selective AuroraA inhibition leads to mitotic arrest and apoptosis, while AuroraB inhibition causes persistent DNA endoreduplication and polyploidy leading to genomic instability. LY3295668 erbumine (LY3295668) is a selective AuroraA inhibitor with preclinical activity in multiple models of cancer including neuroblastoma (NBL). High-risk NBL, a devastating pediatric cancer with few effective treatment options, is mainly stratified by MYCN amplification status. In NBL, AuroraA stabilizes N-MYC post-transcriptionally; moreover, AuroraA also controls N-MYC-dependent transcription during S-phase. Here, we evaluated LY3295668 in multiple NBL cell lines and in vivo mouse models where treatment resulted in apoptosis and tumor regressions, respectively. We compared LY3295668 to alisertib (a dual AuroraA/B inhibitor) in multiple cell-based assays that differentiate AuroraA activity from that of AuroraB and showed that LY3295668 has a distinct pharmacologic profile from alisertib. In addition, we determined the mechanism of action for LY3295668 includes DNA damage prior to mitotic block. Our results further support that AuroraA controls MYC-dependent transcription in S-phase and selective inhibition of AuroraA with LY3295668 promotes transcription-replication conflicts leading to DNA damage. In addition to AuroraA-mediated mitotic arrest, this DNA damage may contribute to the hypersensitivity of MYC-driven tumors such as NBL. In summary, LY3295668 is a selective AuroraA inhibitor with a dual mechanism of action in NBL involving DNA damage in S-phase and a cell cycle block in mitosis. These combined activities contribute to sensitivity of preclinical NBL models. Citation Format: Michele Dowless, Jill Kremer, Caitlin Lowery, Xueqian Gong, Joseph Klahn, Jennifer Stephens, Yu-Hua Hui, Wayne Blosser, Ricardo Martinez, Jian Du, Louis Stancato. Selective inhibition of AuroraA by LY3295668 erbumine in neuroblastoma models induces apoptosis through a combination of S-phase DNA damage and mitotic arrest [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr A32.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→