MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047265442 · doi:10.12688/mniopenres.12850.1

Development and validation of a sensitive HPLC-HESI-MS/MS method for quantitative determination of bitopertin in rat and marmoset plasma

2020· article· en· W3047265442 on OpenAlexafffund
Imane Frouni, Fleur Gaudette, Dominique Bédard, Stephen G. Nuara, Cynthia Kwan, Adjia Hamadjida, Jim C. Gourdon, Francis Beaudry, Philippe Huot

Bibliographic record

VenueMNI Open Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaParkinson CanadaWeston Brain InstituteFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsProtein precipitationChromatographyChemistryHigh-performance liquid chromatographyFormic acidPharmacokineticsMarmosetElectrospray ionizationTandem mass spectrometryElectrosprayMagnololSelected reaction monitoringCallithrixMass spectrometryPharmacologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bitopertin is a potent glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1) inhibitor that has undergone clinical trials for diverse disorders and has a well-documented pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in humans. Even though pre-clinical studies have demonstrated potential therapeutic effects on cognition and neuropathic pain, the PK profile of bitopertin in the rat has been partly disclosed and no study reporting its PK profile in the common marmoset has been published. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with heat assisted electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-HESI-MS/MS) assay to quantify bitopertin in the rat (Sprague-Dawley) and the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) plasma after administration of 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously. The analytical method consisted of protein precipitation followed by HPLC-HESI–MS/MS. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Thermo Scientific Aquasil C18 analytical column (100 x 2.1 mm I.D., 5.0 μm) kept at 50°C using acetonitrile and water both fortified at 0.1% (v/v) with formic acid at a ratio 55:45 as mobile phase with a constant flow rate of 250 μL/min. The calibration function was linear in the range of 0.3-200.0 ng/mL in rat plasma. The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were within ± 15% at all concentrations. The limit of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) in rat plasma were 0.08 and 0.3 ng/mL, respectively. This method has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity and was successfully applied to measure bitopertin in rat and marmoset plasma, allowing the investigation of its PK properties in both species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.382
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMNI Open ResearchSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207